The United Kingdom went a record six days without burning coal this past year — marking the longest recorded period since 1881.
The news comes from a new study by biomass power company Drax and Imperial College London. The study also found the UK received 50.2% of its energy from sources cleaner than coal like solar, wind, biomass, nuclear, and hydropower, and imported low-carbon energy from France between July and September this year.
The study focused on energy markets trends within the UK to see which types of energy are in higher demand.
Read More: These 3 Cities Run on Renewable Energy
In 2010 energy from low-carbon emission sources were 20% of the country's energy market. The jump to more than half the country’s energy in just six years is promising, showing that a break from carbon is possible.
“Coal plants have been pushed off the system by competition from gas, nuclear and renewables,” the report stated. "5 May 2016 was a historic day, the first time since 1881 that Britain burnt no coal to produce its electricity."
Twenty-six percent of lower-carbon power came from nuclear energy produced in the UK. This was the largest contributor to cutting down on coal. Solar (10%), wind (5%), and biomass (4%) followed as the most commonly used.
One-quarter of coal power plants were shut down in the last year across the UK as well.
“Cleaner energy has reached a record high, and carbon emissions from electricity hit a record low,” said Andy Koss, CEO, DRAX.
This is great progress after the UK government set a goal to close the country’s remaining coal power plants by 2025.
Meanwhile, the US's clean energy prospects have grown murkier, as citizens wonder what President-elect Trump will do with the Paris Agreement, and whether he will follow through on his campaign promise to expand US coal production.
As the US awaits a new environmental era, good news on climate change from across the pond is a welcome respite and glimmer of hope for the planet.